You could mine your first block right away, or you might mine it twice as fast as planned. These calculators might be a shock for most small businesses.
For example, you could learn that mining bitcoin with your slow processor would result in your first block being mined 10 years from now, according to statistics. To put it another way, solo mining isn't a viable option for you.
If you truly want to mine bitcoin in this situation, you'll need to join a pool. Mining pools are also designed to be user-friendly, removing many of the technical intricacies and headaches from the mining process. Individual miners benefit from mining pools, and pools benefit from miners' hash rate.
Anyone interested in mining bitcoin for a profit has two options: go solo with their own specialized equipment or join a mining pool, where several miners and their devices pool their hashing power. When choosing a pool to offer your hash rate and mining power to, one factor to consider is pool ideology. Ideology is a difficult notion to grasp, especially when corporations are involved, which is exactly what mining pool operators are: for-profit companies.
Some are beneficent performers, while others have hidden goals beyond monetary gain. Historically, certain pools have sought to destabilize the coins they support. Also Read: Most Stable Cryptocurrencies in Mining pools that mine empty blocks in an attempt to manipulate transaction fee incentives, bottleneck transaction throughput, and promote alternative systems are examples of this. Other mining pools have used their hash rate and clout to prevent system upgrades or to initiate and spread forks of the blockchain they're mining.
There is no one-size-fits-all or simple method for determining mining pool philosophy. Community sentiment and previous actions, on the other hand, are frequently helpful indicators for determining if a mining pool is operating in a way that benefits the larger ecosystem.
Staying up to speed on bitcoin news and perusing internet forums are the greatest ways to sort through the mining pool philosophy. Antpool Pool Mining Source. Pool reputation is another essential consideration when choosing a pool. Some mining pools employ schemes to defraud subscribers by stealing their hash rate or mining earnings.
These pools do not endure long since cryptocurrency news travels quickly and pool miners' switching fees are minimal, making it easy for users to abandon pools that scam miners.
Most users should sign in with their email address. If you originally registered with a username please use that to sign in. To purchase short term access, please sign in to your Oxford Academic account above. Don't already have an Oxford Academic account?
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Sign In or Create an Account. Sign In. Advanced Search. Search Menu. Article Navigation. Close mobile search navigation Article Navigation.
Volume Not all cryptocurrency mining pools function in the same way. There are, however, a number of common protocols that govern many of the most popular mining pools.
Proportional mining pools are among the most common. In this type of pool, miners contributing to the pool's processing power receive shares up until the point at which the pool succeeds in finding a block. After that, miners receive rewards proportional to the number of shares they hold. Pay-per-share pools operate somewhat similarly in that each miner receives shares for their contribution.
However, these pools provide instant payouts regardless of when the block is found. A miner contributing to this type of pool can exchange shares for a proportional payout at any time.
Peer-to-peer mining pools, meanwhile, aim to prevent the pool structure from becoming centralized. As such, they integrate a separate blockchain related to the pool itself and designed to prevent the operators of the pool from cheating as well as the pool itself from failing due to a single central issue. While success in individual mining grants complete ownership of the reward, the odds of achieving success is very low because of high power and resource requirements.
Mining is often not a profitable venture for individuals. Many cryptocurrencies have become increasingly difficult to mine in recent years as the popularity of these digital currencies has grown and the costs associated with expensive hardware necessary to be a competitive miner as well as electricity oftentimes outweigh the potential rewards.
Mining pools require less of each individual participant in terms of hardware and electricity costs and increase the chances of profitability.
Whereas an individual miner might stand little chance of successfully finding a block and receiving a mining reward, teaming up with others dramatically improves the success rate. By taking part in a mining pool, individuals give up some of their autonomy in the mining process.
They are typically bound by terms set by the pool itself, which may dictate how the mining process is approached. They are also required to divide up any potential rewards, meaning that the share of profit is lower for an individual participating in a pool.
A small number of mining pools, such as AntPool, Poolin, and F2Pool dominate the bitcoin mining process, according to blockchain. Although many pools do make an effort to be decentralized , these groups consolidate much of the authority to govern the bitcoin protocol. The payout is offered from the pool's existing balance and can therefore be withdrawn immediately, without waiting for a block to be solved or confirmed.
The possibility of cheating the miners by the pool operator and by timing attacks is thus completely eliminated. This method results in the least possible variance for miners while transferring all risk to the pool operator. The resulting possibility of loss for the server is offset by setting a payout lower than the full expected value.
This method keeps advantages of PPS and pay more to miners by sharing some of the transaction fees. Luke came up with a third approach borrowing strengths from the earlier two.
Like slush's approach, miners submit proofs-of-work to earn shares. Like puddinpop's approach, the pool pays out immediately via block generation. When distributing block rewards, it is divided equally among all shares since the last valid block. Unlike any preexisting pool approach, this means that the shares contributed toward stale blocks are recycled into the next block's shares. In order to spare participating miners from transaction fees, rewards are only paid out if a miner has earned at least 0.
0コメント